<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>UP News</title>
        <link>http://ultimatepolitics.net/</link>
        <description>UP News</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:26:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>I love Denver, but this has got to change...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[ (crossposted at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wade-norris/i-love-denver-but-this-ha_b_299072.html">Huffington post</a>)
I love living in the Mile High City of Denver - I love that since I have moved here in 2000, we have turned from a 'red state' to a purple or even blue state.
I even am willing to give Josh McDaniels a little props for the Broncos getting to <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_13382571">2-0</a>. 
Denver is a great city with the great outdoors and the Rocky Mountains just a 20 minute drive away.
But this <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090923133007.htm">information</a> reported today, makes me sad and mad with Denver.

<blockquote>Denver released the largest amount of greenhouse gases (GHG) and Barcelona the smallest amount in a new study documenting how differences in climate, population density and other factors affect GHG emissions in global cities.</blockquote>



Now living in a city that is this beautiful, it is hard to believe that we beat out <em>Los Angeles</em> for pollution.

<blockquote>Denver had the highest overall GHG emissions, with levels two to five times higher than other cities. Its high levels were due partly to its high use of electricity, heating and industrial fuels, and ground transportation, they note - Los Angeles was second on the list...</blockquote>

What if a city's reputation for pollution was reflected in the Sports team's names?
Instead of the <strong>Denver Broncos</strong> we would be the <em><strong>Denver Bronchitis</strong></em>?

It really should give the leaders of our state's energy policy pause, in light of global warming's threat to the 2 billion dollar <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=4&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aspentimes.com%2Fapps%2Fpbcs.dll%2Farticle%3FAID%3D%2F20040930%2FASPENWEEKLY%2F109300009&ei=ite7SqDsJ4eStgeL3Py0DQ&usg=AFQjCNG_0G8YveWIxvr2Lcy6FxP_s4qlEg&sig2=oEwlrsD30vCqURyIf7zROw">Colorado skiing and tourism industry</a>, when deciding on how to power our state and what Denver emits.
Anyone visiting Colorado Rockies can already see the 2 million Pine trees that are dead or dying due to Pine Beetles - an epidemic many scientist attribute to <a href="http://www.elephantjournal.com/2009/01/global-warming-now-pine-beetles-kill-2-million-acres-in-colorado-alone-25-million-acres-in-n-america%E2%80%94and-speeding/">global warming</a>.
The voters have proven that they want alternative energy - and they proved so by passing approving <a href="http://www.solarpowerrocks.com/colorado/">Amendment 37</a> in 2004 - the first bill in the nation to require a percentage of the state's energy sources be derived from renewable energy. 
The time is now to call on our elected leaders like the <a href="http://www.denvergov.org/Default.aspx?alias=www.denvergov.org/mayor">Mayor</a> and the <a href="http://www.colorado.gov/governor/">Governor</a> to change the way we power our city.
And it is not just about Colorado, while our pollution is 'just' killing our trees in Colorado, it is robbing others of the world's citizens their <a href="http://www.praer.org/2009/08/drowning-states-call-on-leader.html">very way of life</a>.

the time to act is now - even if you are not from Colorado - we are all in this together - contact your <a href="http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm">Senator</a> to support Climate Change legislation like Waxman-Markey a.k.a <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-2454">ACES</a>
As I have written <a href="http://www.squarestate.net/diary/8731/the-one-good-thing-about-china">previously</a>, even though ACES is not perfect,<a href="http://solveclimate.com/blog/20090521/aces-clean-energy-bill-or-coal-energy-bill">especially when it comes to coal</a> - we must go to Copenhagen with <em>some kind</em> of climate bill to get some real action globally started for <a href="http://www.praer.org/watch-islands-sinking---greenp.html">their sakes</a>.
]]></description>
            <link>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2009/09/i-love-denver-but-this-has-got.html</link>
            <guid>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2009/09/i-love-denver-but-this-has-got.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">climate change</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">denver</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">denver broncos</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">environmental refugees</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">global warming</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:26:53 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Andrew Romanoff for CO Senate 2010</title>
            <description><![CDATA[ <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6TlNpks9tvY&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6TlNpks9tvY&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></description>
            <link>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2009/09/andrew-romanoff-for-co-senate.html</link>
            <guid>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2009/09/andrew-romanoff-for-co-senate.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Andrew Romanoff</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Colorado</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Senate</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:25:38 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>BBC: Antarctic Glacier melting &quot;exponentially faster&quot;</title>
            <description><![CDATA[(crossposted at <a href="http://www.praer.org/">www.praer.org</a>)
<p class="first"><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8200680.stm">From the BBC's: <span class="byl">David Shukman &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </span> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </a></p><p class="first">&nbsp;</p><p class="first"><strong>One
of the largest glaciers in Antarctica is thinning four times faster
than it was 10 years ago, according to research seen by the BBC.</strong></p><p>A
study of satellite measurements of Pine Island glacier in west
Antarctica reveals the surface of the ice is now dropping at a rate of
up to 16m a year. </p><p>Since 1994, the glacier has lowered by as much as 90m, which has serious implications for sea-level rise. </p><p>The work by British scientists appears in Geophysical Research Letters. 				</p><table align="right" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="231"> 				<tbody><tr> 			            <td width="5">&nbsp;</td> 			            <td class="sibtbg"> 			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 					 			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<div> 	 		<div class="mva"> 			<img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/start_quote_rb.gif" alt="" border="0" width="24" height="13" /> 			<strong>We've
known that it's been out of balance for some time, but nothing in the
natural world is lost at an accelerating exponential rate like this
glacier</strong> 		<img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/end_quote_rb.gif" alt="" align="right" border="0" vspace="0" width="23" height="13" /><br />	</div> 	 	 &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> 			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<div class="mva"> 	<div>Andrew Shepherd, Leeds University</div> &nbsp; </div> 			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</td> 			        </tr> 				</tbody></table> 				 			 &nbsp; &nbsp;&lt;!-- E IBOX --&gt; 			 	 &nbsp; &nbsp;<p>Calculations
based on the rate of melting 15 years ago had suggested the glacier
would last for 600 years. But the new data points to a lifespan for the
vast ice stream of only another 100 years. </p><p>The rate of loss is
fastest in the centre of the glacier and the concern is that if the
process continues, the glacier may break up and start to affect the ice
sheet further inland. </p><p>One of the authors, Professor Andrew
Shepherd of Leeds University, said that the melting from the centre of
the glacier would add about 3cm to global sea level. </p><p>"But the
ice trapped behind it is about 20-30cm of sea level rise and as soon as
we destabilise or remove the middle of the glacier we don't know really
know what's going to happen to the ice behind it," he told BBC News. </p><p>"This
is unprecedented in this area of Antarctica. We've known that it's been
out of balance for some time, but nothing in the natural world is lost
at an accelerating exponential rate like this glacier." </p> &nbsp;	 &nbsp;	 		 &nbsp; &nbsp; 			 &nbsp; &nbsp;&lt;!-- S IBOX --&gt; 				<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="466"> 				<tbody><tr> 			             			            <td class="sibtbg"> 			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 					 			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<div class="o"> 			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/46206000/gif/_46206116_pineisland_466.gif" alt="Satellite image of glacier" border="0" vspace="0" width="466" height="391" hspace="0" /> 			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div> 					 			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<div class="mva">The
highlighted area shows a dense concentration of crevasses along one
edge of the glacier. Large numbers of deep crevasses are a sign that
parts of the glacier are moving rapidly.....</div> 			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 			 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</td> 			        </tr> 				</tbody></table> 				<br /><p>Professor
Box told BBC News: "The science community has been surprised by how
sensitive these large glaciers are to climate warming. First it was the
glaciers in south Greenland and now as we move further north in
Greenland we find retreat at major glaciers. It's like removing a cork
from a bottle." </p><p>&nbsp;</p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2009/08/bbc-antarctic-glacier-melting.html</link>
            <guid>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2009/08/bbc-antarctic-glacier-melting.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:11:13 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Hey NESTLE-hands off our water!</title>
            <description><![CDATA[..<div style="opacity: 1;" class="intro"><p>Recently in my statewide
travels around Colorado, I have heard a lot about the lack of rainfall
and the drought which is plaguing our state. My bud <a target="_blank" href="http://weatherdem.wordpress.com/">WeatherDem</a> also has been doing an excellent job of covering the measurable effects of Climate Change and the recent mass <a target="_blank" href="http://www.squarestate.net/diary/7789/fourcorners-tree-dieoff-tied-to-global-climate-change-drought">tree die off.</a>
<br />He also has told us about the water grab by <a target="_blank" href="http://weatherdem.wordpress.com/2009/03/23/quick-hit-shell-oil-buying-water-rights-in-colorado/">Shell energy.</a>
<br />If that was not enough, there is a <a target="_blank" href="http://weatherdem.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/2008-pine-beetle-kill-400000-acres-in-co/">Pine Beetle epidemic</a> in our mountains, leaving numerous acres and homes vulnerable to a massive wildfire.</p>

<p>You can imagine my shock today when I read that Nestle co. wants to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_11974140">bottle up 65 million gallons from the Arkansas river.</a></p>

<p>read on...</p><div style="opacity: 1;" id="extended"><p>From Jason Blevins of the Denver Post:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>Nestle -- with <strong>12 U.S. brands of bottled water and almost $4.3 billion</strong>
in North American sales in 2007 -- came calling for Arkansas Valley
spring water about two years ago. The company wants to draw 65 million
gallons a year from an aquifer feeding two freshwater springs near
Nathrop, pipe it 5 miles to a truck stop and ship it 100 miles to a
Denver bottling facility. It would be sold under the company's
Arrowhead brand.Nestle has promised to replace all the water it takes
from the valley and spend $1 million to restore riverside habitat where
a dilapidated fishery sits. It has installed 10 monitoring wells to
gauge the health of the underground aquifer that supplies the springs
and will monitor wetlands near them.</p>

<p>Nestle hydrogeologist Bruce Lauerman calls the plan a "sustainable,
surgical extraction" of water and describes preserving the pristine
water supply by taking only a fraction of its flows.</p>

<p>"We are one of the best things that could happen to these springs,"
he said. "Our involvement affords a level of protection that other
owners and users of this property could never offer."</p>

<p>Maybe so, say many locals. But no thanks.</p>

<p>"We have to take everything they are promising on faith," said
Michele Riggio, who last week helped found the anti-Nestle group
Chaffee County Citizens for Sustainability. "The risks are too great,
and there are not enough proven benefits, so why try?"
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The point here Nestle guys, is that you have already got 12 brands
of bottled water, which alone probably creates its own huge carbon
footprint in plastics, gasoline use and clogged transportation, and you
are making <strong>4.3 BILLION</strong> dollars from those brands.
<br />Water is the one resource you can't pay money for. Once an aquifer is drained, it doesn't come back.
<br />While this may seem like one county's problem, imagine a drought
and a forest fire spreading across the Rockies with even less water
than we already have now.</p>

<p>But it gets better. Nestle had to pay for study on the impact of the
water draining as part of the exploration. That research differed from
theirs...
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Several residents trumpeted a consultant's review of Nestle's
research by Colorado State University ecologist Delia Malone -- a review
commissioned by the county and funded by Nestle as part of the county's
permitting process.
<br />The report repeatedly criticizes the water bottler for not
considering warming climate trends when studying wildlife, wetlands and
the long-term ecological health of the aquifer, which catches drainage
from the Mosquito Range. Malone's review contradicts the company's
research by suggesting that <strong>water withdrawal during a drought could drain the aquifer and nearby wells could run dry</strong>.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Nestle has an all too familiar sounding response:
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Nestle says the report "is not based on scientific evidence"
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Why is it that when interfering with making tons of money, scientific evidence becomes something other than scientific evidence?
<br />we already know about the lengths Nestle will go to in selling their <a target="_blank" href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/585395/nestles_aggressive_marketing_kills.html">powdered infant formula</a>, so this dismissal of scientific evidence should be no surprise.</p>

<p>I had a phone interview with Michelle Riggio of Chaffee County
Citizens for Sustainability and she summed up the situation with Nestle
and also Shell as more proof that the big companies are making their
grab for next big thing in the commodities market - water.
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"They want to privatize our water"
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Let's all do ourselves a favor and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nestleusa.com/Public/ContactUs.aspx">contact Nestle </a> and let them know how you feel about this idea.
<br />The water belongs to the people and to the forests that can't exist without it.</p>

<p>I want to encourage you to thank Jason Blevins for covering this story at the Denver Post jblevins@denverpost.com
<br />and to encourage the local residents who are with the Chaffee County Citizens for Sustainability group by visiting their <a target="_blank" href="http://nestleinchaffee.blogspot.com/">blogspot</a> or emailing them
<br />at ccfsustainability@gmail.com.</p>

</div>

</div> ]]></description>
            <link>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2009/03/hey-nestlehands-off-our-water.html</link>
            <guid>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2009/03/hey-nestlehands-off-our-water.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">drought</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">nestle</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">water</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:30:38 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Overwhelming support for Andrew Romanoff for the Colorado Senate Primary...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>(crossposted on <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/3/8/134659/1896?new=true">Daily Kos</a>) <br />Here in Colorado, we just had our annual Democratic Party Jefferson Jackson dinner. The speaker was former Clinton Aide, and CNN commentator, Paul Begala. <br />There were two things about this dinner that surprised me. <br />The first was the ability of Paul Begala as a speaker, (<em>his closing topic about his Grandmother's visit to the White House brought down the house</em>) <br />and second, was the level of support for Andrew Romanoff for a Senate Primary run in 2010...</p>
<p>First of all, I was pleasantly surprised by Paul Begala. The man can give a speech. He is one those rare democrats that can weave his beliefs and religion into his speech without coming across as preachy. Thank you Mr. Begala. </p>
<p>Secondly, our first official testing of the waters was quite successful. At the Colorado Convention Center, the annual JJ Dinner was larger than it has ever been, and our numbers of elected officials was larger than it has ever been. <br />As we handed our volunteers their clipboards with sign up sheets and stickers that said "Friends of Andrew Romanoff", I was a little skeptical about how willing people would be to show their support. It takes nerve for volunteers to circulate petitions for a primary at a formal function. <br />However, my volunteers were running out of stickers and out of sign up sheets and were turning people away by the time dinner started. 
<p>Senior Citizens don't come up to you and grab your arm and tell you <strong>"tell him we are behind him" </strong>for nothing. 
<p>And, even more so, elected officials in the State House and Senate have a lot to risk by signing our sheets to support Andrew Romanoff in a primary, <em>yet they still did so.</em> <br />And this dinner was not a freebie. Tickets were over $100, and the people there are part of the fundraising base. <br />Barack Obama has proven that when the people are behind you, they can outraise the millionaires and make their voices heard. 
<p>Thanks to Ray, Lori, Alex, Faren, Julia and to Sarah for your hard work last night. (sorry I did not print up more stickers and sign up sheets!!!) 
<p>Mr. Romanoff, if you are reading this, the support for you is real, the people are behind you. <br /></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2009/03/overwhelming-support-for-andre.html</link>
            <guid>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2009/03/overwhelming-support-for-andre.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">2010</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Andrew Romanoff</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Colorado</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Primary</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Senate</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 13:04:51 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Romanoff for Senate 2010 Table at Jefferson Jackson dinner</title>
            <description><![CDATA[As you might have read, after hearing people's opinions in the community on Ritter's <i>pass</i> on Romanoff (not to mention Perlmutter, Hickenlooper, J.Salazar, and DeGette) for Senate, I started a <a href="http://www.facebook.com/inbox/readmessage.php?t=1038011196575&amp;f=1&amp;e=0#/group.php?gid=65931140497&amp;ref=ts">facebook</a> group for Andrew Romanoff for Senate for 2010. <br />Since doing this, &nbsp;several people have spoken to me to let me know that there is growing support for Andrew Romanoff for a Senate primary for 2010. 
<p>So, we are starting a "Andrew Romanoff for Senate 2010" table at the Jefferson Jackson dinner on March 7th. <br />If you knew the people I knew who were wanting this to go forward (and there a more than a few of you) I'd bet you'd be interersted in supporting his candidacy. </p>
<p>Event: </p>
<p><i>Celebrating Real Change: 2009 Jefferson-Jackson Dinner &nbsp; <br />The 76th Annual Jefferson Jackson Dinner will be held on Saturday, March 7, 2009 at the Korbel Ballroom in the Colorado Convention Center at 700 14th Street, Denver, CO 80202. &nbsp; 
<p>Registration and silent auction begins at 5:30 p.m. &nbsp; <br />VIP reception is at 6:00 p.m. <br />Dinner and program run from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m </i>
<p>Cost is $125 per ticket. <br />email me at ultimatepolitics@hotmail.com to arrange the ticket purchase, 
<p>and join the group <a href="http://www.facebook.com/inbox/readmessage.php?t=1038011196575&amp;f=1&amp;e=0#/group.php?gid=65931140497&amp;ref=ts">here</a>.&nbsp; </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2009/02/romanoff-for-senate-2010-table.html</link>
            <guid>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2009/02/romanoff-for-senate-2010-table.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">2010</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Andrew Romanoff</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Colorado</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Senate</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:56:43 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>I now openly support Romanoff for a 2010 Primary</title>
            <description><![CDATA[I just started my new job travelling the state to help abused and neglected children. While visiting a small rural town in Colorado (Lamar) I decided to go to the Prowers county dems meeting. It was a very good meeting,but something unexpected happened.<br />I suddenly got the 'preacher' over supporting Andrew Romanoff in a primary for Senate in 2010.At this meeting of die-hard rural dems, someone mentioned getting more young people involved in Democratic politics. <br />Neat idea, I thought, so I suggested getting a Young Dems chapter started. (more on that soon) <br />Next, another person mentioned getting a guest speaker to speak to a new Young Dems group, then names of elected officials started. <br />Then "it" happened. <br />I could not fathom having <em>appointed</em> (and yes, that should be a dirty word) Senator Michael Bennett speaking on being a public servant politically, after his appointment over several other people, most notably, Andrew Romanoff. How could he speak on his service to Colorado and why being involved in community,politics and government, is so important when you imagine the comparison. Romanoff - worked hard, got elected, served 8 years, several as House Speaker, only to be passed over for 2 different statewide posts for someone who has lived in Colorado for less time than I have? (9 years for me) <br />It made no sense. <br />So I let loose on supporting Romanoff, openly, for a primary. <br />And the strangest thing happened - people liked the idea and were more behind it than I could have imagined. <br />So here we are, me writing this, and you reading and deciding now, will you, fellow dem Coloradoan, tread the safe ground and stick with Gov. Ritter's appointment, who by any <em>objective</em> measures, is more vulnerable to Republican opponents than Romanoff, or will you take a stand now to support the candidate who can win, and more importantly, has <em>proven</em> he can serve his constituents and will represent our needs, concerns, and interests in the U.S. Senate <br /><a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/group.php?gid=65931140497&amp;ref=ts">We Support Romanoff for Senate 2010</a>&nbsp; ]]></description>
            <link>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2009/02/i-now-openly-support-romanoff.html</link>
            <guid>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2009/02/i-now-openly-support-romanoff.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">2010</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Andrew Romanoff</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Colorado</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Senator</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:54:11 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Co Sec. of State - stealing election for McCain</title>
            <description><![CDATA[In this <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/23/16139/7943/385/590486">article</a>,
I wrote about how the Secretary of State of Colorado, Mike Coffman is
engaging in activities that would make it easy to steal Colorado's
votes, and the national election, for McCain.
<br />Now, in the state that has been compared to 2004's Ohio, Coffman
is throwing out thousands of new voter registration forms through a
minor technicality.
<br />While this may anger you in a general way, it angers me personally
even more. You see, while working on a voter registration drive to get
Obama elected,my team and even me personally have registered numerous
voters, and have heard from many voters, especially in our African
American communities <strong>"this will be my first time voting"</strong>,
and to know now that they are going to be turned away at the polls,
along with all of the other people registered by Rock the Vote, ACORN,
the Obama Campaign and the Democratic party, makes me sick to my
stomach.
<br />Read more for the background on this story and Coffman's outrageous ruling to disenfranchise voters.<br /><br />In what I previously covered:

<ol><li value="1"> Colorado, according to Stu Rothenberg's &nbsp;<a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/whats_the_top_electoral_colleg.html">What's the Top Electoral College State This Year?</a>, Colorado is now THE swing state as Florida and Ohio were in 2000 and 2004.</li></ol>
<ol><li value="2"> Secretary of State Mike Coffman broke the law last
year by allowing his database manager Dan Kopelman to manage the
database while he was running a Republican voter database company on
the side. See story by <a href="http://coloradoconfidential.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3183">Dan Whipple</a></li></ol>
<ol><li value="3"> Coffman's State Elections Director was <a href="http://www.coloradoforethics.org/node/26748">discovered to be staying at a loft owned by the software salesman who manages the Voting Machines</a>
for our state, machines that have already been de-certified, then
re-certified by Coffman. She resigned pending an investigation, and it
calls into question the veracity of our voting machine process.</li></ol><br /><br /><ol><li value="4"> Now, Coffman has ruled on new voter registrations and decided this:</li></ol>
<p>(from <a href="http://coloradopols.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=7597">Colorado Pols' Dan Willis</a>)
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>At Issue: Forms used by Voter Registration Drives. They include a
place for people to include their Driver's License Number, State ID
Card Number or Social Security Number (only requires last 4 digits).
There is a box present which states "I do not have a Colorado Driver's
license or Dept. of Revenue identification number" which people are
supposed to mark if they are going to only give an SSN.
<br />The Secretary of State has included in his Rules (dated July 2008)
that any new voter who does not mark that box and only gives their SSN
shall not be registered to vote. &nbsp;<strong>In mid-September he issued a memo to the County Clerks telling them specifically to not register anyone who does this. </strong>
<br />Consequence: Thousands of new voters are attempting to register to
vote, thinking they are successful because they signed up through some
organization such as ACORN or any of the political parties, but are not
registered and will not be allowed to vote if they do not correct their
forms.</p>

<p><strong>When I say thousands, I am not over-exaggerating. In Denver
County alone (the only one I have numbers for so far) this ruling has
resulting in approx. 3000 denied voter registrations! And that is just
one county, and one with thousands of more forms to even look at!</strong></p>

<p>The SoS's sorry excuse? They claim to upholding the law, specifically CRS 1-2-204(f.5) which states:
<br />"In the case of an elector who has been issued a current and valid
Colorado driver's license, the elector's Colorado driver's license
number. If, instead of a driver's license, the elector has been issued
a current and valid identification card by the department of revenue in
accordance with part 3 of article 2 of title 42, C.R.S., the elector
shall provide the number of the identification card. If the elector has
not been issued a current and valid Colorado driver's license or
identification card, the elector shall answer that he or she does not
have a driver's license or identification card and shall provide the
last four digits of the elector's social security number. If the
elector does not have a social security number, the elector shall
answer that he or she does not have a social security number."
</p>
</blockquote>
I have looked at our copies of Voter Registrations. Thousands of
them. And the majority of these people who think they are registered to
vote are going to be disenfranchised by this devious, deceptive, and
underhanded ruling.
<br />This may cost us the state for Obama, maybe even the entire general election.<br /><br />
<p>(Here is the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aL6AsDJe8bg">interview with Colorado Ethic's Watch Chantel Taylor and Colorado Media Matter's Bill Menezes</a> on these issues and the
failure of the media to report these criminal activities.)</p><br /><p><br /></p><p>

Please continue to forward this to any lawyers you know or contact the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/info_center/contact.html">Secretary of State's office here,</a>
<br />or the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.denverda.org/contacts.htm">Denver District Attorney's office</a>.</p><p><br /></p><br /><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2008/10/co-sec-of-state-stealing-elect.html</link>
            <guid>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2008/10/co-sec-of-state-stealing-elect.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Colorado</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">election integrity</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Florida</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Kathryn Harris</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Ken Blackwell</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mike Coffman</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Ohio</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Secretary of State&apos;s office</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">stolen elections</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:08:18 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Are You a &quot;CARD CARRYING LIBERAL?&quot;</title>
            <description><![CDATA[ Welcome back to another installment of UP News. The guys in this interview are indeed, card carrying liberals, and not only that, they are the ones coordinating events for the Big Tent event for Bloggers in Denver for the Convention. 
John Erhardt and Aaron Silverstein are my kind of activists. Both are Editors for <a href="http://www.squarestate.net/">Square State</a>, which is one of the main blogs in Colorado. Additionally, Aaron is with <a href="http://democratswork.org/">Democrats Work</a> and will be organizing the Delegates for Actions in Denver the week of the convention.  John is the state coordinator of <a href="http://livingliberally.org/drinking/chapter_blog/there-political-thing-coming-Denver-or-something">Living Liberally/Drinking Liberally</a> and says


if you want to be a CARD CARRYING LIBERAL!
then visit <a href="http://www.theliberalcard.org/">the living liberally website here.</a>
i highly recommend coming to visit.










<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KbcUgB2Jya4&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KbcUgB2Jya4&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>



<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ut7F9yb5oKo&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ut7F9yb5oKo&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></description>
            <link>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2008/09/are-you-a-card-carrying-liberal.html</link>
            <guid>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2008/09/are-you-a-card-carrying-liberal.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">2008 Democratic Convention</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Aaron Silverstein</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Big Tent Denver</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Bloggers</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Bobby Clark</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Daily Kos</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Democrats Work</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Drinking Liberally</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">HispanicTips</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John Erhardt</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Living Liberally</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">square state</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:14:54 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Healthcare action w/SEIU and Gov. Strickland speaks</title>
            <description><![CDATA[ This past week, a coalition of progressive groups gathered in Columbus, Ohio to make the people's voices heard on the subject of affordable Healthcare. 



This group included 
SEIU,ACORN,Progress Ohio,UHCAN (Universal Health Care Action Network),SPAN (Single Payer Action Network),Justice for Janitors, and Gamaliel affiliates AMOS and NOAH

Speakers:
Bruce Colburn, SEIU
Brian Rothenberg, ProgressOhio.org
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3OaYH2PzJ4&feature=user">Stephanie Beck Borden</a>, Gamaliel/AMOS
<a href="http://www.uhcanohio.org/index.html">Cathy Levine and Christine Conroy UHCAN Ohio.</a>
 

Hattip to <a href="http://www.progressohio.org/page/community/group/ProgressOhio/?page=2">Lorraine Bieber of Progress Ohio</a>

At the same time, the insurance industry's spokes people were placing the blame on the providers and the people were not buying it. 

<a href="http://www.ahip.org/">AHIP</a> (American's Health Insurance Plan) finally met with some frustrated citizens who have seen too many denials to healthcare claims. 

Keep reading, unless you have had been supported by<a> government paid healthcare.</a>

This video, which is 3 minutes, is cut from a solid hour of loud chants and protests over the state of our healthcare. It starts with a march around the capitol of  Ohio, up to the location of the AHIP meeting, and includes  
<a href="http://www.progressohio.org/page/dashboard/public/gGBh29">Brian Rothenberg</a> of ProgressOhio.org, who points out that the health insurance companies are kicking off a national public relations tour, just as the oil companies are kicking off their new PR tours about how good they have been to us. 
Mr. Rothenberg, you do the Ohio Progressive community proud. 


<strong>AND Ohio Governor Ted Strickland rallies the troops </strong>





While we rallied on the outside, here is what was happening on the inside - listen to this incredulous audio from the AHIP meeting courtesy <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/7/23/91344/7037">nyceve</a>


Kim asks
<blockquote> "Why would Angela Braly (CEO of Wellpoint) make such a comment? Would she sacrifice on the <a href="http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2008/05/19/bil10519.htm">9 million dollars she made this year, would she sacrifice?"</a>
[Angela Braly is the CEO of Wellpoint. In April she told investors "we won't sacrifice profitability for membership". [applause]</blockquote>

Spin Answer of the year:
<blockquote>Ignagni: "You talk to a hospital, you talk to a doctor, you talk to any concerns, you talk to a profit or not-for profit industry, you hear <strong>no margin, no mission</strong>. So the question is, you rather be in the black not the red, to do anything in our society  is very important."</blockquote>

rise up...







<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/30VUHgJYT2Y&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/30VUHgJYT2Y&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8oItROtKs_s&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8oItROtKs_s&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


]]></description>
            <link>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2008/09/healthcare-action-wseiu-and-go.html</link>
            <guid>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2008/09/healthcare-action-wseiu-and-go.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ACORN</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Gamaliel affiliates AMOS and NOAH</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">HEALTHCARESEIU</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Justice for Janitors</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Progress Ohio</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">SPAN (Single Payer Action Network)</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Ted Strickland</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">UHCAN (Universal Health Care Action Network)</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:45:06 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>In Oil We Trust</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>My guest today is Doug Vilsack, and he is here to tell us about a situation in Ecuador. What happened there and who did you meet?

Doug Vilsack -
I went to Ecuador where I met an amazing person, Pablo Fajardo. He grew up in Ecuador, and with much adversity, got his High School diploma, a rare thing there. Later he got a computer degree, then a law degree. In 2000, he got started working on his first case, the Chevron/Texaco case. This case had been tied up in the U.S. courts for years, and got transferred to Ecuador. So he was working on the case, and the lead lawyer quit. So basically a year out of law school he became the lead attorney taking on Chevron, which is a big case - the damage estimate is said to be 6 billion.

This will be the biggest environmental case in the world, the first time that a big oil company will be held responsible for evironmental damages.  </blockquote>

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/askeBC-qQFo&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/askeBC-qQFo&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

<blockquote>Question - Doug, what happened with the news coverage of this case, particularly CNN?

A - So Pablo Fajardo is the lawyer and he got a CNN 'heroes' award this year, a humanitarian award. He was one of 7,000 nominated and won the award in the fighting for justice category, a process which included being voted on by a blue ribbon panel with folks like Lance Armstrong. He got to go to New York and accept the award and he got his story published on the website.

Q - On CNN's Website?

A - Yes on CNN's website, it got published on there for a few days then a few days later it disappeared.

Turns out that Chevron had just kicked off this big ad campaign worth millions to try to sell Chevron as an environmentally friendly and supportive of sustainable energy, and it turned out, Chevron talked to CNN and got them to pull the story from the website.

Question - <strong>So it is not like they bowed to the advertising about any story, but a story they made, for an award that they gave out !?!</strong>

A - Yes,<strong> then Chevron put out press releases in Ecuador saying Pablo had somehow defrauded and tricked CNN into giving him the award.</strong> You know Lance Armstrong voted for him for this award - how would this guy in the Amazon Rainforest somehow trick Lance Armstrong?

Question - So first they scrub the story up here, then do a PR campaign in Ecuador and, if you are living in a country with not as many good educational resources, and you've got some corporation spending millions of dollars or more defrauding this person...it is so unfair.

A - Yes, there is a big difference in the resources Chevron has and the resources these people have, it is a David and Goliath Story.
It almost works to their advantage, because Chevron is there in California with a team of lawyers, and they can't believe that this guy 1 year out of law school could beat them, so they underestimated him at every step.
Its racism really, when you are looking at this guy who doesn't have the education and hasn't grown up with all the things these Harvard lawyers have had.
They think they can beat him, and they are not, and that shows that the human spirit can triumph over those folks who think they can bully you around.
One of the most important things to do is to think of these folks in Ecuador as your neighbor.
You meet these people and they are like anyone else, they are struggling, they are trying to get by, and they are trying to make ends meet. They are just like anyone else in the world, trying to farm and survive and they are being harmed by the stuff we put in our cars, so we need to think about that.
There is a great article in Vanity Fair - google it, it is called  <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/05/texaco200705">Jungle Law</a>.

And you can go to the website

<a href="http://www.texacotoxico.org/eng/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1">texacotoxico.org or chevrontoxico.com</a>.   <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/05/texaco200705">Jungle Law</a></blockquote>



Some statistics that Doug and I discussed related to the condition of the land and water where these people live in Ecuador:
The toxity rates for Benzene, a by product of sloppy oil drilling, is over 1000 times the EPA level in the states.

*Chevron covered open oil pits with dirt as their 'clean up', resulting in the spoiling of the groundwater and land in general.
*Childhood leukemia is at 3 times the national average in these homes.
*In many homes, one or more of the family members is dying from rare forms of cancer from toxicity exposure from the oil extraction and by products.
*Families that rely on cattle or livestock, as most do, have had many animals lose weight and die, and the females abort their offspring, leaving no new animals for food or income.


All this is going on while Chevron is promoting their 'Human Energy' of their new PR campaign. Not only that, Chevron had this to say in the court hearing in Ecuador:
<blockquote> (from Vanity Fair, by William Langewiesche)Chevron ... denies that the judge is fair, denies that the plaintiffs have legitimate complaints, denies that their soil and water samples are meaningful, denies that the methods the company used to extract oil in the past were substandard, denies that it contaminated the forest, denies that the forest is contaminated, <strong>denies that there is a link between the drinking water and high rates of cancer, leukemia, birth defects, and skin disease, denies that unusual health problems have been demonstrated--and, for added measure, denies that it bears responsibility for any environmental damage that might after all be found to exist</strong>.
...
Over the 17 years that Texaco operated this conduit to the sea, until Petroecuador assumed control, in 1989, the pipeline suffered 27 major breaks and <strong>spilled nearly 17 million gallons of oil, much of which was not cleaned up. The volume of the spills has been widely reported. For comparison, the grounding of the Exxon Valdez spilled 11 million gallons....</strong> </blockquote>

But here is their PR campaign on how much they care.
(Is that the voice of actor Scott Campbell from 'Singles' - the character that wanted a light rail in Seattle?)



This ad is so slick, I almost believe them. Until I remember that they have attacked Pablo in his own country through an full on attack ad campaign, accusing him of defrauding CNN to win a humanitarian award.  

Not only that, but the methods that polluted Ecuador is now being exported to other countries.
These other countries who are being polluted include <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/2077836.stm">Angola</a> and other companies like <a href="http://www.africaaction.org/docs01/shel0107.htm">Shell, polluting the Niger Delta.</a>



More here:
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Africa/Bush_BlackGold_WAfrica.html credit to Chris Fagan
<blockquote>The Delta region, home to Nigeria's oil industry, is poor and polluted. The antiquated oil pipeline system is subject to regular spills and gas fires. The people are subject to routine savage repression by police and soldiers. In the 1990s, the government executed Ken Saro-Wiwa, a leader of the Ogoni people, along with seven others. Saro-Wiwa's brother revealed that Shell Oil, which controls 50 percent of oil operations in the Niger Delta, offered to halt the executions if Ken Saro-Wiwa agreed to call off the Ogoni people's demonstrations against Shell. The accounts are legion of oil companies, principally Shell and Chevron, hiring mercenaries or soldiers to kill political opponents or local activists.</blockquote>

Not only that, but these oil companies are located in the places that are also the home to some of the worst dictators, that the U.S. and Bushco has supported, not to mention that we are in Iraq for mainly oil revenues.

I don't know if Barack Obama will do as much as I want on this subject, but he is our best chance. We must start demanding an all electric car sector. We know we have had the technology since they killed the electric car. We know that there is more than enough wind and solar power to supply our entire country with both electricity for businesses and homes, AND quote : <strong>we could put our entire auto fleet on wind generated electricity through these plug in hybrids.</strong>
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/6/23/16450/5398/260/540786


 We can't simply think of the impact of oil in terms of only hurting the environment, because we have naively trusted that the oil companies would not literally kill people in other countries through their oil drilling practices.
I am tired of trusting big oil. I don't trust them, nor the
Bush agenda and not even those who are looking for timid middling steps to change the way we address energy. We were lied to, yet we are still guilty of complicity in the damage that has been done and will keep being done until we end our dependence on all oil.

In Oil We Trusted and in Oil we have killed. I say no more.
We must stop this. Visit the website on Ecuador here

<a href="http://www.texacotoxico.org/eng/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1">texacotoxico.org or chevrontoxico.com</a>


<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7jMsoUnXz4Y&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7jMsoUnXz4Y&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></description>
            <link>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2008/09/in-oil-we-trust.html</link>
            <guid>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2008/09/in-oil-we-trust.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Bush</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Chevron</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Doug Vilsack</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Ecuador</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">environmental</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Iraq</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">oil</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Pablo Fajardo</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Texaco</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Ultimate Politics</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:37:47 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>How to end the recession: Labor and Renewable energy: (Blogumentary Part 4)</title>
            <description><![CDATA[ In parts 1-3 of this <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/6/23/16450/5398/260/540786">'blogumentary'</a> we covered the amount of renewable energy just waiting for us to tap, how local governments and people are getting involved, and how we need the federal government to change the laws to support renewable energy. (and a good bit of information from <strong>Dcoronata</strong> on <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/11/175837/148">Geothermal energy.</a>
Now for the bread and butter issue: jobs. With the economic forecast showing a continued housing slump and general signs of a recession, a decade long approach of offshoring jobs,  bad unemployment numbers, and no real growth in any job sector except service jobs, there seems to be a lot wrong with our country's economic health. Fortunately, there is a solution for these problems, the emergence of green collar jobs. 

In this installment, we are going to be listening to Richard Eidlin from the Apollo Alliance, and Carmen Rhodes from FRESC. 


<blockquote>Question - How do we get good jobs from Renewable energy and what does the Apollo alliance do?
A- (Richard Eidlin) The <a href="http://www.apolloalliance.org/">Apollo alliance</a> (whose slogan is: <em>Good Jobs, Clean energy, Freedom from Foreign Oil</em>) is a coalition of business, labor and environmental groups focused on growing the economy in a substainable prosperous way by investing in clean energy that will result in <strong>MILLIONS</strong> of good jobs across the United States. This includes jobs in the automotive industry, building and infrastructure, construction, engineering... that would impact electrical engineers, contractors, construction workers, marketing people, installation techs, bringing new jobs to the market.</blockquote>

<blockquote>(me) One of the tings you are hoping to do is to go into the urban sectors where jobs have been lost, and retrain and re-employ workers to make solar panels or intricate parts for wind turbines...

(Richard Eidlin) Yes, particularly in the industrial midwest, there is a tremendous opportunity to create a manufacturing base once again. There are a lot of facilities lying dormant, many skilled workers - what we need now is the political will and capital to bring those jobs back.  For instance, parts to wind turbines could be manufactured in parts of Ohio or Michigan if legislators would act on this. </blockquote>


<blockquote>Carmen, what is FRESC and what do you do?
<a href="http://www.fresc.org/">FRESC </a> (whose slogan is <em>Good Jobs, Good Communities</em>) is a Colorado organization looking to create and retain good paying jobs, create and maintain low income housing with environmental sustainability in mind, and we really believe in connecting environmental sustainability with economic sustainability with workers. But, it is not going to 'just happen'. We have to be systematic and strategic about how that happens, so that people building things (like electric) light rail sysytems, that the work is done by construction workers who are making good wages and have health care. 

(me) you mentioned the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) in Denver moving in this direction.


(Carmen Rhodes) Organized labor, like the building trade, are really training the next generation of construction workers to have the skills necessary to build with environmental sustainability. Here at the IBEW, they have installed solar panels as a training opportunity for their 
workers and now have also saved hundreds of dollars in energy costs. </blockquote>


Remember Millions of new jobs, and not jobs serving coffee or mopping floors, but engineering and manufacturing jobs, jobs that have been outsourced and that took a lot of the middle class livelihood with them. 

Get in touch with these individuals at www.apolloalliance.org and www.fresc.org.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7kcffKTRmAs&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7kcffKTRmAs&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


]]></description>
            <link>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2008/09/how-to-end-the-recession-labor.html</link>
            <guid>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2008/09/how-to-end-the-recession-labor.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Apollo Alliance</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Carmen Rhodes</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Economy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">FRESC</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">green collar jobs</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Jobs</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Renewable Energy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Richard Eidlin</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:31:13 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>A Renewable Energy &apos;blogumentary&apos;:  Part 3 of 6:Federal/National energy initiatives</title>
            <description><![CDATA[ <strong>Ron Lehr</strong> of the American Wind Energy Association agrees, <a href="http://www.awea.org/">AWEA</a>, there has got to be some movement on the National level by the Federal Government, if we are really going to embrace the change necessary to move our country forward quickly.
Here is the interview:
<blockquote>If you put a 'V' on the country with the bottom of the V at Texas, all those plains states have enormous wind resources. If we can get transmission lines to the coast where the people live, <strong>we could put our <em>entire auto fleet </em>on wind generated electricity through these plug in hybrids.</strong>


<strong>Question - why isn't this happening?</strong>
A- People think <em>"well, why doesn't the market just take care of this?"</em>We don't have a free market in the energy sector. There is no aspect in energy that is near a free market.
We subsidize the oil, coil and gas industry through our tax dollars. The nuclear industry is subsidized by the 
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price-Anderson_Nuclear_Industries_Indemnity_Act">Price-Anderson Act</a> (which subsidizes all clean up costs over $900 million dollars) without which the Nuclear industry could not insure itself and therefore, could not exist, so that is clearly a tax subsidy. 
(the only challenge to the Price Anderson Act was in my home state of NC, which went before the Supreme court and lost in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Power_Co._v._Carolina_Environmental_Study_Group">Duke Power vs. Environmental Study Group </a> decision.)</blockquote>

<blockquote>In 1992, the Congress approved a subsidy for wind and other renewable energy, the <a href="http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/clean_energy_policies/production-tax-credit-for-renewable-energy.html">Production Tax Credit</a>, which equalizes the tax incentives that other energy industries get. Since then, the Production Tax Credit has gone out of existence 3 times. All of the other subsidies for the fossil industries are fixed in the tax code, they are all permanent. <strong>They must think we are stupid in Washington. We've got permanent subsidies for the things we don't want, and inconsistent subsidies for the things we do want. </strong>
They need to hear from people about this. One way is to go to <a href="http://awea.org">AWEA.org</a>, and get on the action alert to fix this Production Tax Credit situation. </blockquote>

Indeed, the 'free market' has been controlled for the past 100 years through an oligarchy of a few companies all interconnected between oil, coal, gas, and of course, automobiles. These companies have gotten legislation for their tax subsidies from us, while stifling subsidies for renewable energy.
We are now paying $4 a gallon, while the oil industry is still getting subsidized. 
Imagine, if our government was subsidizing Wind or Solar the way other governments are. For instance, it has been China, that is leading the way with their brand new <a href="http://www.worldwatch.org/node/4217">MAGLEV Windmill Technology</a> which actually uses wind power to generate a magnetic field to run the windmill blades with no moving machinery, or ball bearings,  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maglev_windmills">just a suspended magnetic field supporting the turbine.</a>

We need to go in a new direction to compete and to save the planet. It is true that the World's economy is shifting to renewables, and despite the 'smart people' saying it is a world that is going to be about getting control of the oil, I believe that the revitalization of America's job sector and restoring the middle class will be putting people to work in building electric light rails, solar panel factories and windmill factories. We can be the leader and put our eonconomy back on track:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FTTghYIPDv4&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FTTghYIPDv4&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></description>
            <link>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2008/09/a-renewable-energy-blogumentar-2.html</link>
            <guid>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2008/09/a-renewable-energy-blogumentar-2.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">AWEA</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Federal subsidies</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Price Anderson Act</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Production Tax Credit</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">renewable</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Ron Lehr</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">wind energy</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:16:31 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>A Renewable Energy &apos;blogumentary&apos;:Part 2 of 6:Local energy initiatives</title>
            <description><![CDATA[ Part 2: Local Energy Initiatives: This will cover some of the ways citizens have gotten involved in passing laws to change their options for energy use, effectively giving a level playing field fo renewable energy. Now, although this post seems to be Colorado focused, the fact is, in part due to the location of the National Renewable Energy lab in Golden,Colorado combined with an active progressive community, Colorado has been leading the nation in embracing renewable energy. Here to tell us more about this and the Clean Energy Progress Fund - an initiative to be voted on this fall in Colorado, is Professor Thomas McKinnon, a Chemical Engineer,who has worked both with the NREL and with the School of Mines and now heads up the drive to support the Clean Energy Progress Fund.
Part 2: local energy initiatives
<blockquote>"we have cost effective solutions"</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Question - Tell us, Professor McKinnon, what is the Clean Energy Progress Fund?
A - The Clean Energy Progress Fund is a way to support Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency and promote carbon sequestration in agricultural soils and forests. It is a triple win, it will help us with our economy, with our energy security, and will strengthen our environment.
We really need to have a more secure energy source and the Clean Energy Progress Fund will promote solar power, especially Concentrating Solar Power, which focuses the sun through mirrors on a trough, like the one in <a href="http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/story?id=47803">Las Vegas</a>, which generates 64 megawatts. 
Through Concentrating Solar Power, we could <em>easily</em> generate all the electricity for Colorado, just in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Luis_Valley">San Luis Valley</a>, and at a cost that is competitive with a coal powered plant. 
Many of the things we are proposing,the only way for them to happen is for the government to get involved. 

For Transmission lines and other upgrades, that is where the Clean Energy Progress Fund would provide money from the people. 
We are also helping to create community action. For instance in Boulder, (first city <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15651688/">in the U.S. to pass a carbon tax in November 2004)</a> we have communities that are getting together to talk about how to save energy and the environment. Because we can see changes in the environment, and there are dangers, increased droughts, wildfires, new problems like beetle infestations, and so on. Global warming is a global issue, so Colorado could eliminate our heat trapping emissions to zero and there would still be an issue, but collectively through this Clean Energy Progress Fund, Colorado can be a leader, passing the first of bill of this kind nationally. </blockquote>

People all around the country should get involved in this bill. Just like in 2006, 
<a href="http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/story?id=17736">when Colorado passed the first law of its kind, the first time in the Nation's history that a renewable energy portfolio standard was put directly before voters rather than processed through a state's legislature</a>
there are the naysayers that say we can't do things like this. In that campaign, the 'smart people' said it would be impossible to make Xcel energy and other large utilities to commit to making at least 3% of their energy portfolio renewable energy by 2007 and 10% by 2015. Not only were they wrong, but Xcel reached 6% by 2007, and now leads the country in renewable energy. 
That makes ripples, that will effect everyone, and will put pressure on the other Utilities to follow suit.

Clean Energy Progress Fund will take Colorado and the Nation to the next step by raising 200 million through this fall's ballot, for renewable energy in Colorado, and as an example for the Nation.
They need your help to change our future. Get involved.
Go to <a href="http://www.cleanenergyprogress.org/Clean_Energy_Progress/Home.html">www.cleanenergyprogress.org</a> and get involved, contribute and help (and tell <strong>Professor Thomas McKinnon</strong> where you heard of them) because this issue, and global warming, can't wait.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HW-5EIGyEaQ&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HW-5EIGyEaQ&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></description>
            <link>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2008/09/a-renewable-energy-blogumentar-1.html</link>
            <guid>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2008/09/a-renewable-energy-blogumentar-1.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Boulder&apos;s Carbon tax</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Clean Energy Progress Fund</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Colorado</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Colorado School of Mines</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Concentrating Solar energy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">National Renewable Energy Lab</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Professor Thomas McKinnon</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Renewable Energy</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:08:47 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>A Renewable Energy &apos;blogumentary&apos;: Part 1 of 6: No new drilling</title>
            <description><![CDATA[ 


This past week there has been a lot of talk from both Bush and McCain about the necessity for the Congress to start permitting new drilling sites for Oil companies in the face of high oil prices, as seen in this video
<a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=B1ueE_asuDQ"> from the BBC</a>, even though there is plenty of evidence that the real reason for the high prices are the insiders and speculators that Randi Rhodes <a href="http://forums.therandirhodesshow.com/lofiversion/index.php/t2999.html">first documented this week.</a>

If these revelations of inflated fuel prices anger you, then I hope you won't be fooled by the rhetoric to 
drill, drill, drill.


Part 1 of 6: No new drilling: we have 25 times the renewable energy needed to run our country.

That's right, while we are debating how much to drill, where to drill and if we should drill ANWR, we are sitting on untapped energy sources: in this case, solar and wind.



First up: Coal, fossil fuels, and the untapped abundance...

Nancy LaPlaca from Energy Justice:
<blockquote>Coal has the same CO2 emission rate as the entire transportation sector. Coal emits 40% of all CO2, 2/3rds of all sulfur dioxide, 1/3rd of all mercury.

These fossil fuels have hidden costs in terms of CO2. Now fossil fuels like oil and natural gas are escalating at a rate of 15% a year. The exciting thing about renewable energy like wind and solar is that when we look at their costs in 2020, we don't have to think about what they will cost.</blockquote>

Costs of energy are felt by us in many ways, whether it is at the pump, or heating your house in the winter or the electricity to run your business. Each of our states uses the 'basket of energy' approaches, which as of now, is usually a basket of fossil fuels, like natural gas or oil or coal. These fossil fuels fill up the 'grid' for electricity for the nation, state by state, region by region, and grid by grid. Grid by grid, you say? Yes, the country is broken down into grids (more on that later) and each state has a grid capacity (remember Enron and California's grid fiasco that ultimately caused Gray Davis to be  <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2005/feb/05/enron.usnews">recalled.</a> 
But that is another scandal...
Colorado,for instance, uses a grid of 12 gigawatts of electricity. That is like needing to plan a trip for the summer and you know that you will always need 12 gallons of gas. So in peak moments in the hot of the summer sun or coldest of winter nights, the full capacity of 12 gigawatts is being supplied by oil, natural gas and oil. The trick is, what if we had a more plentiful source that was cheaper and had no harming effects to the earth. What if you knew that  <em>just in Colorado alone </em> 
there is enough energy to run the entire state and many others as well, over 296 gigawatts of electricity from wind and solar resources. With other states in the west participating, we could achieve total energy independence for the entire nation. We could haved a completely electric automobile and transportation sector. Listen to this...

Leslie Glustrom from Clean Energy:
Just in Colorado alone, we have: 

<blockquote>In Colorado, Colorado has 96 gigawatts of wind energy. 
In terms of Solar energy, Colorado has 200 gigawatts of energy. 
(me) enough to power the Midwest...?
Yes more than enough. We have to give credit to Xcel who has made great gains to become a leader among utility companies.</blockquote> 

Websites:
Nancy LaPlaca
nancy@energyjustice.net
http://www.energyjustice.net/

Leslie Glustrom
lglustrom@gmail.com
http://www.cleanenergyaction.org/html/about_us.html

For students and their teachers who want to get involved in renewable energy:
www.ausra.com

This first part is just to show you what is already here and waiting. There is no need to drill. none. whatsoever. It is time for our leaders to stop denying science and bowing to big oil pressures and embrace the future.
This concludes part 1.
Part 2 tomorrow - Local energy initiatives, how your town, city or state can start investing in renewable energy.


<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XaDelhvtQ98&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XaDelhvtQ98&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/BuI2o6thWX4&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BuI2o6thWX4&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></description>
            <link>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2008/09/a-renewable-energy-blogumentar.html</link>
            <guid>http://ultimatepolitics.net/2008/09/a-renewable-energy-blogumentar.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogumentary</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Clean Energy Action</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Energy Justice</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">George Bush</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Leslie Glustrom</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Nancy La Place</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Ultimate Politics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Wade Norris</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:03:08 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
